Simplified Financial Statement
Audit Support Solutions
Precision Segregation of Duties Diagnostics for Optimal Compliance
SOD Check: Redefining Audit Efficiency
In Silicon Valley’s vibrant tech sector, SOD Check emerges as a revolutionary tool for financial statement audit support with its specialized segregation of duties diagnostics. Tailored for growing tech enterprises and smaller public companies, SOD Check offers scalable options for enhanced audit compliance and efficiency.
Why SOD Check for Your Financial Statement Audits?
Detailed Features
SOD Check: NetSuite Product Features
| Page | Purpose | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Executive summary | C-Suite or Audit Committee slide presentation recaps the current diagnostics and includes historical results for each of the nine metrics when you continue using SOD Check regularly |
| 2 | Executive summary overview | This file is for controllers, directors, and managers to validate the diagnostic results and to explain the diagnostics to executives. The file has supporting details for each metric including the evidence-based proof-of-work to the supporting diagnostic. |
| 3 | SOD Summary | This report shows the total count of all unique segregation of duties rules conflicts by permissions/roles, the “what could go wrong”, and the risk priority level. |
| 4 | Admin Conflicts by User | This report shows the segregation of duties conflicts that are caused by conflicting permissions enabled within the administrator role which has been assigned to an active user. |
| 5 | Conflicts within Same (1) Role | This report shows the segregation of duties conflicts that are caused by conflicting permissions enabled within one active role. |
| 6 | Conflicts in Same User with Same Role | This report shows the segregation of duties conflicts that are caused by conflicting permissions enabled within one active role which has been assigned to an active user. |
| 7 | Conflicts for Same User with Multiple Roles | This report shows the segregation of duties conflicts that are caused by conflicting permissions enabled in two different roles which are assigned to the same active user. |
| 8 | Comparison of Conflicts in Same User with Same Role to Previous Period Analysis 1) by Segregation of Duties rule 2) by Role 3) by Permission 4) by User |
This report shows the conflicts within the same role compared to the previous diagnostic results. This report is only available when the company has performed a previous diagnostic. |
| 9 | Comparison of Conflicts for Same User with Multiple Roles to Previous Period Analysis 1) by Segregation of Duties rule 2) by Role 3) by Permission 4) by User |
This report shows the conflicts between roles compared to the previous diagnostic results. This report is only available when the company has performed a previous diagnostic. |
| 10 | Exhibit A – username and roles input data | This is the input data of usernames and roles the company originally provided for analysis. |
| 11 | Exhibit B – roles and permissions input data | This is the input data of system roles and permissions the company originally provided for analysis. |
| 12 | Exhibit C – permissions analyzed | This is the list of permissions analyzed. |
| 13 | Exhibit D – roles, permissions, conflicts output | This is the output data of users, their roles, and conflicts from the tool. |
| 14 | Validation – explanation of data checks | This explains the various data validations performed for data completeness and accuracy. |
| 15 | Exhibit E – completeness of permissions | This verifies the completeness of permissions analyzed from source data to output data. It contains written evidence and proof of work explanations. |
| 16 | Exhibit F – completeness of roles | This verifies the completeness of roles analyzed from source data to output data. It contains written evidence and proof of work explanations. |
| 17 | Exhibit G – completeness of usernames | This verifies the completeness of usernames analyzed from source data to output data. It contains written evidence and proof of work explanations. |
| 18 | Exhibit H – accuracy of permissions, roles and usernames | This verifies the accuracy of usernames, roles, and permissions in the data output compared to the data input. It contains written evidence and proof of work explanations. |
| 19 | Exhibit I – IPE original system report parameter completeness | This verifies the accuracy of IPE (information produced by entity) for original system report. It contains written evidence and proof of work. |
| 20 | Exhibit J – IPE original system report parameter accuracy | This verifies the accuracy of IPE (information produced by entity) for original system report. It contains written evidence and proof-of-work. |
| 21 | Exhibit K – IPE original system report parameter integrity | This verifies the integrity of IPE (information produced by entity) for original system report. It contains written evidence and proof of work. |
| 22 | Considerations and Exclusion | This explains the diagnostic process with exclusions and inclusions for management to consider when evaluating the results. |
Executive Summary Features
The Executive Summary slide not only recaps the current diagnostics but also includes trended results for each of the nine metrics when you continue using SOD Check regularly.
By continuing to use SOD Check for your NetSuite environment, you’ll gain not only immediate insights but also valuable longitudinal data to inform your audit strategy and decision-making over time.
Success Stories from Silicon Valley
Stay Informed with SOD Check
Latest Trends in Financial Statement Audit Support
Our [Resource Center] provides insights into financial statement audit support, SOX compliance trends, and best practices.
Elevate Your Audit Process
With SOD Check, experience unmatched precision, efficiency, and tailored compliance in financial statement audits. Begin enhancing your audit process today.